BrokenGavelTwo high-profile death penalty trials are underway in King County Superior Court: the 2009 assassination of Seattle Police Officer Timothy Brenton and the 2007 Christmas Eve mass murders of three generations of the Anderson family in Carnation. Both crimes were horrific, senseless acts of hatred and violence that caused incredibly searing pain, suffering and loss for the victims’ families, friends, neighbors and the broader community.

But, the death penalty delivers nothing more than a false promise.

I was a Seattle police officer in the 1970s. I spent many nights in my patrol car doing exactly what Officer Brenton and his partner, Britt Sweeney, were doing when they were shot. As a Councilmember, I went to Harborview the night Officer Brenton died. I spoke briefly with Officer Sweeney. The targeted murder of Officer Brenton strikes a deep chord of grief within me. As a father of three and grandfather of two, the slaying of the Andersons does the same.

I want swift and certain justice delivered to their killers, but the death penalty won’t provide that swiftness or certainty.

Some people believe they are safer because of the death penalty; they’re not. 


The death penalty does not deter homicides and does not make our communities safer. A review from the National Research Council concludes that no credible evidence exists to suggest that it does.

Some people believe justice is better served by the death penalty; it’s not. The pursuit of capital punishment delays final resolution for victims’ families and communities, inflicting even further pain and suffering. Of the 9 current offenders on Washington’s death row, an average of 17 years has passed since the year of their crime. Seventeen years! There is no swiftness or certainty in that reality.

At the end of the long road of appeals, the majority of Washington’s death row inmates have had their sentences converted to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Spending millions of dollars and dragging victims’ families through years and sometimes decades of uncertainty only to end up in the same place (a sentence of life without parole) is not a worthwhile exercise of justice. And moving faster is not a viable option; the appeals processes and protections exist for a very important reason: one hundred fifty innocent individuals and counting have been exonerated from death rows across the country. We make mistakes, but there’s no room for error when it comes to administering the death penalty.

Some people believe we administer the death penalty fairly; the evidence shows we do not. A University of Washington professor’s analysis of Washington’s aggravated first degree murder cases suggests the death penalty is applied disproportionately across Washington. Juries were 4.5 times more likely to impose a death sentence on a black defendant than on similarly situated white defendants.

Why do I make these points now? It’s certainly not to minimize the trauma, the grief and the pain experienced by those most closely connected to the tragic deaths of Officer Brenton and the Anderson family. I make these points now because these cases serve as examples of how the death penalty leaves us with missed opportunities for safer communities and a better justice system.

Earlier this month, a report from Seattle University found that, on average, death penalty cases in Washington cost about 1.5 times more than other aggravated first-degree murder cases, including post-conviction incarceration costs. This amounts to more than $1 million per case in extra costs.

The costs of the current King County cases have risen above $15 million. This is no trivial sum. $15 million could mean 30 more police officers patrolling our streets for 5 years. It could deliver to more than 3,000 families the support of the Nurse-Family Partnership, an early intervention program for first-time, low-income mothers and their babies that is proven to reduce involvement in the criminal justice system later in life. It could provide high-quality preschool for more than 1,300 children, another proven investment that reduces criminal behavior. It could enhance staffing on police “cold case” investigative teams, or provide stronger victim support and advocacy services.

The death penalty does not strengthen or protect the women and men of our police departments, it will not deter future acts of violence or murder, it will not bring meaningful and positive change to our communities, and it cannot be administered both quickly and fairly. This is the false promise of the death penalty.

Eighteen states have abolished capital punishment in favor of safe and just alternatives, including six in the last eight years. Governor Jay Inslee’s moratorium on executions last year was an appropriate first step; let’s go further and finish the job by abolishing the death penalty (read a letter from the Mayor, City Council and the City Attorney urging Seattle's representatives in Olympia to support safe and just alternatives). We’ll save millions of dollars that could be used more effectively and we will achieve the type of justice we really deserve—swift, certain and fair.


Comments

8 responses to “The False Promise of the Death Penalty”

  1. Kevin Avatar
    Kevin

    You state: “an average of 17 years has passed since the year of their crime. Seventeen years! There is no swiftness or certainty in that reality.”
    Perhaps the problem is in enforcing and acting on a death penalty verdict rather than the death penalty itself. Anti-death penalty advocates, such as yourself, are to blame for your own statement above.

  2. Mathew"RennDawg"Renner Avatar

    You just told me you HATE victims of crime and love killers.

  3. Mathew"RennDawg"Renner Avatar

    You, Mayor Murray, Pete Holmes and the rest of the city council think the people who murder people are heroes and the victims deserve what they get.

  4. Tim Burgess Avatar

    Kevin, as I wrote above, moving faster and circumventing appeals risks the execution of an innocent person. The appeal processes exist for a reason. There’s no room for error when it comes to administering the death penalty.

  5. D Avatar

    6) Responsible Government Programs Only Happen with Responsible Government Officials
    All of the alleged shortcomings of the death penalty are, truly, the shortcomings of Washington government, which has refused to implement responsible governing protocls, the same problem with many government programs, as many citizens are aware. (see Virginia)
    Both that, obvious, cause, as well as the lack of fact checking, caused the recent irresponsible letter from the Seattle Mayor, City Council and City Attorney to their state legislators, on this topic
    Is that any surprise to many voters?

  6. D Avatar

    Burgess: “There’s no room for error when it comes to administering the death penalty.”
    No known innocents executed in the US, since the 1930’s.
    From 14,000 – 28,000 innocents have been murdered by those known murderers we have allowed to murder, again – recidivist murderers – just since 1976 (from two different recidivism studies, from different years).
    Up to 200,000 innocents have been murdered by those criminals we have released from custody or not incarcerated, since 1973.
    from
    The Death Penalty: Do Innocents Matter? A Review of All Innocence Issues
    http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-death-penalty-do-innocents-matter.html

  7. D Avatar

    5 comments b y “D” were not posted.
    I have no idea hwere “D” cam from, it is Dudley Sharp

  8. Jim Misiano Avatar

    Simply astounding that Burgess won’t even fact check.
    RE: Rebuttal to Seattle Councilman Tim Burgess ( also the Mayor, other council members and the City Atty)
    Subject: Burgess’ “The False Promise of the Death Penalty”, CITY VIEW, January 26, 2015
    http://timothyburgess.typepad.com/tim_burgess_city_view_/2015/01/the-false-promise-of-the-death-penalty.html
    From: Dudley Sharp
    These were all posted (slight editing, herein) to Burgess’ City View blog, at the linked site.
    1) Innocents at Risk
    Burgess: “There’s no room for error when it comes to administering the death penalty.”
    No known innocent executed in the US, since the 1930’s.
    From 14,000 – 28,000 innocents have been murdered by those known murderers we have allowed to murder, again – recidivist murderers – just since 1976 (from two different recidivism studies, from different years).
    Up to 200,000 innocents have been murdered by those criminals we have released from custody or not incarcerated, since 1973.
    from
    The Death Penalty: Do Innocents Matter? A Review of All Innocence Issues

    http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-death-penalty-do-innocents-matter.html

    2) Costs
    Since 1976, Virginia has executed 70% (108) of their death sentenced murderers, with 7.1 years of appeals, on average, a protocol which would save money in all jurisdicitions over life without parole.
    Not even a false claim of an innocent executed
    Only government incompetence in Washington, not the death penalty, has caused your stated problems.
    Be responsible and fix them. Virginia did it, so can Washington.
    See
    Saving Costs with The Death Penalty

    http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2013/02/death-penalty-cost-saving-money.html

    3) Racism

    I didn’t realize that Washington was such a hot bed of racial prejudice. Leadership in the state must be terrible.

    RACE & THE DEATH PENALTY: A REBUTTAL TO THE RACISM CLAIMS
    http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2012/07/rebuttal-death-penalty-racism-claims.html
    “There is no race of the offender / victim effect at either the decision to advance a case to penalty hearing or the decision to sentence a defendant to death given a penalty hearing.”

    “As blacks represent 47% of murderers and whites 37%, we see that whites are twice as likely to be executed for committing murder as are their black counterparts.”

    4) DETERRENCE
    The proof that the death penalty deters some is overwhelming.
    The proof that the death penalty deters none does not exist.
    In fact, the death penalty protects more innocent lives, in three ways, than does life without parole.

    With complete rebuttal to National Research Council – very easy.

    a) The Death Penalty: Do Innocents Matter? A Review of All Innocence Issues
    http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-death-penalty-do-innocents-matter.html
    b) OF COURSE THE DEATH PENALTY DETERS: A review of the debate

    http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2013/03/of-course-death-penalty-deters.html

    5) Murder Victim Survivors
    Burgess is wrong in blaming the death penalty for harm to justice and murder victim survivors. Obvioulsy, it is the fault of Washington government officials. I suspect he blames all government problems on anything but those elected to govern, a common ailment . . . of the elected.
    a) Murder Victims’ Families Against The Death Penalty: More Hurt For Victims Families
    http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2012/04/victims-families-for-death-penalty.html
    b) Anti Victim: Anti Death Penalty Movement

    http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2014/04/anti-victim-anti-death-penalty-movement.html

    6) The 150 “exonerated” Fraud
    From 70-83% of the “exonerated” or “innocent” released from death row has been a well known fraud, for well over 15 years, when these claims started at 69 in about 1998.
    Basic fact checking would have been helpful in the council’s considerations.
    Start with paragraphs 3 & 4
    The Innocent Frauds: Standard Anti Death Penalty Strategy
    and
    THE DEATH PENALTY: SAVING MORE INNOCENT LIVES

    http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-innocent-frauds-standard-anti-death.html

    7) Responsible Government Programs Only Happen with Responsible Government Officials
    All of the alleged shortcomings of the death penalty are, truly, the shortcomings of Washington government, which has refused to implement responsible governing protocls, the same problem with many government programs, as many citizens are aware. (see Virginia)
    Both that, obvious, cause, as well as the lack of fact checking, caused the recent irresponsible letter from the Seattle Mayor, City Council and City Attorney to their state legislators, on this topic
    Is that any surprise to many voters?

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Tim Burgess

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading