Yesterday morning I spent time with 11- and 12-year-old boys and girls in summer school. Operated by Rainier Scholars, the summer sessions are part of a 14-week immersion program designed to strengthen academic proficiency, teach organizing skills, and set the kids on a path to college.

I visited three classrooms: American history (Frederick Douglass, slavery), English literature (Shakespeare and Homer's Odyssey), and mathematics (algebra).  I saw seasoned teachers in control of each classroom, peppering their students with questions, engaging in dialog, walking around.  The students were engaged, attentive and excited to be there. 

Watching these students, hearing them discuss the tough choices Frederick Douglass faced when confronting his master or the smile spreading across the face of a young girl when her math teacher let out a cheer when she solved the algebra equation or the young man practice his oratory by reading from the Odyssey was inspiring.  It renewed my passion for true education reform in Seattle. 

Many of these kids have the deck stacked against them in so many ways.  They come from low-income families in Seattle. They are all students of color. They would likely never attend college; no one in their family has.  Frankly, their chance of even graduating from high school would normally be much, much lower than their peers.  Yet here they were soaring.  They exhibited strong self-confidence and a keen interest in learning.  They understood the opportunity they now had in front of them. 

The Rainier Scholar program is an add-on to each student's regular schooling.  Joining the program in the fifth grade, each student pledges to attend after school classes every Wednesday and all day every Saturday throughout the school year, plus two years of summer school.  The program believes that each student can learn at a high academic level and will successfully graduate from college.  From what I saw yesterday, I believe it, too. 

Too bad every student in Seattle who faces similar circumstances doesn't have the same opportunity.

I wrote an opinion piece in The Seattle Times yesterday with Council President Richard Conlin about the need for serious education reform.  President Obama has been a courageous leader on this topic.  The president spoke last week to the National Urban League and reiterated his case for reform.

Here are other posts about my experiences with students and schools in Seattle.  This one is about the new teacher contract in the District of Columbia and two of my high schools teachers.  Here's another on what education reform might mean in Seattle. And this one details my experience at Mercer Middle School.  

Planning for renewal of the city's Family and Education Levy is underway.  You can discover the details here. 


Discover more from Tim Burgess

Subscribe to receive the latest posts in your inbox.

Tim is a former member of the Seattle City Council (2008-2017). He served as the city’s 55th mayor for 71 days after the previous mayor resigned in 2017, and as a deputy mayor in Mayor Bruce Harrell’s administration (2022-2025). Tim was the lead architect of the Seattle Preschool Program, first adopted by Seattle voters in 2014 and since renewed and expanded. As a public official, he focused much of his work on the critical birth-to-five years of a child’s life, stronger police effectiveness and accountability, economic development, and building the common good. As mayor in 2017, Tim negotiated an agreement with Seattle Public Schools to replace Memorial Stadium at Seattle Center (originally built in 1949) . The new stadium will open in fall 2027.


Comments

3 responses to “Investing in Our Children”

  1. Charlie Mas Avatar
    Charlie Mas

    Did you read the reaction to your “opinion piece” in the Seattle Times? You didn’t respond to any of it. Are you willing to engage in a discussion with citizens or just make pronouncements from your seat on high? Do you think that one-way communication constitutes engagement?

  2. Tim Burgess Avatar

    Charlie, sorry for my delay in responding; I’m away from Seattle this week. I posted again here: http://timothyburgess.typepad.com/tim_burgess_city_view_/2010/08/education-reform-for-our-children.html
    My issues regarding teacher effectiveness and evaluation are not so much the methods used but doing so, including strong linkage to student performance. As Councilmember Conlin and I pointed out in our opinion piece in The Seattle Times, we are comfortable grading our kids, but not the schools or teachers responsible for their education. This is a key reform that is needed now.

  3. Charlie Mas Avatar

    Grading teachers is not a key reform, nor is it needed.
    We already evaluate the teachers. There is no lack of accountability there. Our principals have all of the tools they need to dismiss an ineffective teacher. If they don’t, then the principal isn’t doing his or her job and that is where we need to apply some accountability.
    The lack of accountability is at every level above the teachers and that is where we need the reform. Did you read the State Auditor’s report on Seattle Public Schools? Do you not see the huge need for reform in the central administration and the Board?
    I read your follow-up piece; I read it in Crosscut. Do you see the response to it there? It was similar to the response to your Seattle Times piece. Do you see that all of the thoughtful people are on the other side of this from you? The only people on your side are crackpots and people looking to make money on reform.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Tim Burgess

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading